The Sun Ray Server component will use very little in terms of Disk. A single pair of disks mirrored should be adequate.

As far as sizing of the disks that hold the actual VMDK files, that depends. Their sizing has nothing to do with the client software that you are running. Whether it's a Sun Ray or a repurposed PC, the backed storage to the VM disk files will be the same. If you have individual OS instances and each is unique, then you will have to multiply the size of your Virtual HD by the number of VM's.

If you are using the premium version of View which has the Linked Clone technology, then your disk usage will be smaller. Linked Clones allow you to only write the changes or differences between VM's to disk instead of the entire OS. Sun also has this capability in it's VDI software using Sun virtualization back end. These savings are only realized if your 100 users are using the same master image as a baseline.

VMWare has plenty of documentation and sizing guidelines for this.


Brad

On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Jason Lue wrote:

This is great info.  How about storage?  How many users can you put on
say 14 drives?  (with CSM tray in mind).  Thank you so much.

-Jason Lue

= ======================================================================
Three cores would be a nice starting point. That's 33 concurrent
sessions each. If your concurrency is less than 100%, then you can get
by with less.

Some customers scale much higher than this (50/core) and some less (25/
core). It completely depends on the screen updates the users are
driving with applications and window management.

As far as memory goes, a very safe bet is 100MB/user. This would allow
for very large screens for each user and some headroom. For typical
1280x1024 screens, 75mb is more of what is seen.

Brad


On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Jason Doyle wrote:

Team,

I'm looking for practical numbers to use for sizing SRSS to host 100
concurrent users connect to VMWare View using the Sun Ray Connector
for VMware View Manager.
- How many Xeon 5540 (@2.53 GHz) cores would I need?
- How much memory per user should I plan?

BTW, the Xeon 5500-series "Nahalem" CPU's @ 2.5 GHz, which offer
significant performance compared to previous generations.

Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users


Brad Lackey
Datacenter Desktop - Technology Lead
North America
(720) 548-3339

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Brad Lackey.vcf
Type: text/directory
Size: 483 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://www.filibeto.org/pipermail/sunray-users/attachments/20090819/139
ef90d/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users


Brad Lackey
Datacenter Desktop - Technology Lead
North America
(720) 548-3339

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:3.0
N:Lackey;Brad;;;
FN:Brad Lackey
ORG:Sun Microsystems;
TITLE:US-SW Desktop Virtualization Technology Lead
EMAIL;type=INTERNET;type=WORK;type=pref:[email protected]
TEL;type=WORK;type=pref:720-548-3339
TEL;type=CELL:303-875-8616
TEL;type=WORK;type=FAX:(720) 548-3339
item1.ADR;type=WORK;type=pref:;;13320 Racquet Ct.;Poway;CA;92064;United States of America
item1.X-ABADR:us
CATEGORIES:Personal
X-ABUID:57E6612B-F276-4934-9C7A-CC683249EDB1\:ABPerson
END:VCARD


_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to