I think I got the basics of it. Thanks for the responses.
________________________________ From: Jacob Grundmeier <[email protected]> To: SunRay-Users mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 2:19:02 PM Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] DTU Bandwidth To use the correct terminology, the bandwidth I have been referring to is downstream traffic. Can you point me to some documentation on how to use the .prams file? This would be my only option in this environment. BTW, What I meant by the servers perspective is that if I were the server I would be sending graphics packets to the DTU, i.e. uploading the packets. I apologies for any confusion. Jake ________________________________ From: Joerg Barfurth <[email protected]> To: SunRay-Users mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:41:07 AM Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] DTU Bandwidth Jacob Grundmeier schrieb: > The max for them is a little over 40 meg for upstream bandwidth from the > Servers perspective. Just to be clear: "upstream" generally designates client-to-server (here: DTU-to-server) traffic, whereas "downstream" would be use for server-to-client traffic. I'm not sure what "upstream from the server's perspective" is meant to say. > The 22meg is the combined total for around 60-70 active sessions from Sun Ray > traffic. That would still seem a lot, if you don't do any upstream audio (i.e.. microphone on the DTU to recording app on the server). The vast majority of Sun Ray traffic should be server to DTU, i.e. downstream. AFAIK the bandwidth limit you can set (via DHCP, .parms files or DTU menus) affects the downstream (graphics rendering) traffic only, because that is where large bandwidth consumption can occur. - Jörg _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
