This is the first I've heard that 4.1 performs slower than 4.2 in any
environment.
I'd be interested to hear from others if they have the same (or
different) experience.
-Bob
Marty Scholes wrote:
Bob Doolittle wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you still have the previous
OSol Boot Environment?
Of course not, that would be simple. I am thin on space in rpool, so I torched
125 shortly after I noticed 126 was basically ok.
We have heard reports that things slowed
significantly in a particular
OpenSolaris build, that would be nice to verify.
That is interesting. I was on 125 when I went from 4.1 to 4.2 and I have
subsequently moved to 126. Both 125 and 126 seemed to have performance issues
with 4.2.
The SRSS upgrade went so poorly that my new evil plan is that this weekend I do
a fresh install of 126 and 4.2 to rule out any upgrade-weirdness.
If it makes more sense I can try to find an older OSol build to start with and
upgrade from there to see where 4.2 hits the wall. Is there a particular build
you think might be a good starting point?
Personally I hate gnome-terminal and continue
to use xterm, and I've not
seen a big change.
I probably should do the same, but gnome-terminal seems to be the current fad,
so I use it. I also miss xterm: quick, simple and always worked. But my
nostalgia doesn't stop there. When Gnome bothers me I long for OpenLook and
when I get particularly annoyed with Unix I start longing for the days of 3279
terminals (kind of an early multihead) stacked next to each other on my desk
while working on DOS/VSE.
What version of browser do you use?
Don't have it in front of me; whatever the default is in 126.
Many thanks for the feedback.
Sincerely,
Marty
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
