There are to our knowledge no *extra* problems involved in using link aggregations. As OttoMeister notes though, you're going to run into trouble using utadm -a (lowercase) for making a dedicated interface.
You'll have to make absolutely sure that the routing on all levels of course routes the 172.168.10.0/24 net to 192.168.254.0/24, and you'll still have to use utadm -L to switch on LAN connections, or the SRSS framework will deny the Sun Ray. So you might be better off using the utadm -A (uppercase) for making a shared interface in the first place. But it all depends on what you want to do. We did a setup as mentioned using Solaris 10 10/08 with no extra problems due to the aggregates. 2009/10/22 James Tan <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > anyone know if the following would work? > > SRSS 4.1 + Solaris 10 with link aggregation (intf = aggr1) e.g. > 192.168.254.1 <---->gateway<--->router<---> DTU e.g. 172.168.10.10 using > sunray-servers and sunray-config-servers to find AltAuth(192.168.254.1) > > Would like to use utadm -a on the aggr1 > > > > thanks a lot, > James > > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > > _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
