What version of firmware are you using? This looks like an MTU problem.
Kent
On 11/10/09 15:28, Ken Mandelberg wrote:
We just started testing using Sunray 2's with the built in VPN support,
running Easy VPN against a Cisco 5505. The performance level is
disappointing. Even with the Sunray on the same 100mbit LAN with the
Cisco's public port, I get utcapture numbers like
# TERMINALID TIMESTAMP TOTAL PACKET TOTAL LOSS BYTES SENT
PERCENT LOSS LATENCY
00144fa80ecf 20091110173047 207446 55350 145037960
00144fa80ecf 20091110173302 223863 59449 156892372 49.445
00144fa80ecf 20091110173332 226171 59523 158986168 3.206
00144fa80ecf 20091110173447 239002 63446 167464254 44.676
00144fa80ecf 20091110173502 246927 67209 171753756 47.483
00144fa80ecf 20091110173602 254985 68677 178630044 34.639
00144fa80ecf 20091110173702 257126 68824 180463716 8.507
This is with just one active Sunray, doing some simple web browsing, no
multimedia. Even a tiny multimedia window is really unusable.
Is this normal? If not where is the limitation? Is it the Sunray
managing the tunnel, or the Cisco? Is there some tuning we are missing?
I had been using a Sunray 2 at home over cable modem, with a Solaris <>
Solaris IPSEC tunnel provided by a workstation. That combo performs
better over the internet, than the Sunray 2 does doing internal vpn
against the Cisco directly on the lan.
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
