Thanks for the reply. The 2 FOGS are coexisting nicely together and we are able to selectively direct DTU's as necessary.
-Costa -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joerg Barfurth Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:54 AM To: SunRay-Users mailing list Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] SRSS 4.1 and 4.2 on same subnet.... Constantine Morris schrieb: > I currently have an SRSS 4.1 with SRWC 2.1 FOG installed in LAN mode in > my datacenter on a unique subnet. The DTU's are on other subnets and > are routed to the 4.1 FOG and all is well. I would like to install a > 4.2 FOG on the same subnet as the 4.1 FOG and selectively point DTU's to > it as necessary. The question is, can I have multiple FOG's of > different SRSS versions on the same subnet coexist without them noticing > each other? I don't want to impact my current 4.1 FOG in any way. > As long as the two FOGs use different group signatures, they should not affect each other. You can selectively direct DTUs to one or the other of the FOGs using DHCP, local configuration, .parms files for the initial connection or AMGH for a per-session/token decision. HTH - Jörg _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
