Also on the ThinGuy blog, looks like the livery has been updated:

http://blogs.sun.com/ThinGuy/entry/introducing_the_sun_ray_3

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Stephen Repetski <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/virtualization/sun-ray-3-plus-ds-06531
> 6.pdf<http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/virtualization/sun-ray-3-plus-ds-06531%0A6.pdf>was
>  recently posted on the Oracle website detailing the tech specs of
> the Sun Ray 3 Plus client, as well as the marketing as to why you should
> buy
> one (or 10). Looks to have some good improvements. Can also be found from
> the Virtualization page
> (http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/virtualization/)
>
> ----------
> Stephen (Trey) Repetski
> [email protected] | [email protected]
> srepetsk.net    | RIT '13, TJHSST '09
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of William Yang
> > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:26 AM
> > To: 'SunRay-Users mailing list'
> > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives
> >
> > Okay.  The wireless will probably be a big help at our facility (now
> speaking
> > with my TJHSST hat on) since our network engineer doesn't want to use
> > wireless bridges for security reasons and we want to deploy Sun Rays as
> > kiosks in places where there currently are no hardwired network drops.
> And
> > I think the school district isn't authorizing funds to put in new drops
> since we
> > have a renovation coming up in the next year or two.
> >
> > William Yang
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users-
> > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Beeler
> > > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:17 AM
> > > To: SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives
> > >
> > > No ours don't have the wireless due to not being able to have a
> > > wireless device in our facility.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Yang
> > > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:10 AM
> > > To: 'SunRay-Users mailing list'
> > > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives
> > >
> > > You wouldn't happen to know which types of wireless (802.11abgn) and
> > > security modes (open/WEP/WPA/WPA2 pre-shared key, PEAP, CHAP, etc.)
> > > are supported would you?
> > >
> > > William Yang
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users-
> > > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin Beeler
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:52 AM
> > > > To: SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives
> > > >
> > > > I have 2 Sun Ray 3's in my possession at work.  We are doing testing
> > > of
> > > > the units for Sun/Oracle for them.  They are great! Obviously they
> > > > support 4 monitors instead of two, they have a SFP port to put a
> > > > GBIC
> > > in
> > > > place for fiber, and finally they put a darn power button on a Sun
> > > Ray!
> > > > Plus they have definitely worked on the graphics performance, flash
> > > and
> > > > what not seems definitely faster and the overall picture quality is
> > > much
> > > > better.  Also you can get them with wireless built in if your
> > > > environment permits.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave
> > > > Koelmeyer
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:13 AM
> > > > To: SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > > Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache archives
> > > >
> > > > Precisely - thanks for summing that up nicely William. Not just
> > > > Flash, but video content in general.
> > > >
> > > > I also have daydreams about a thin client/zero-configuration device
> > > that
> > > > could support a virtual 3D learning environment, such as (or could
> > > have
> > > > been) delivered by Sun's own Project Wonderland effort (now Open
> > > > Wonderland).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 26/03/10 04:12 PM, William Yang wrote:
> > > > > Videos, especially Flash.  Because of YouTube, users want this
> > > > > more
> > > > than
> > > > > they used to.  It's also a reasonable expectation of a modern
> > > machine,
> > > > and
> > > > > we are always in the situation where replacing any workstation
> > > should
> > > > mean
> > > > > that the new system put there will do better than the old one,
> > > > > thin
> > > or
> > > > fat.
> > > > > Users don't care what's there, they just want to see it all work.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are actually looking at an expanded use of thin clients at the
> > > > Johns
> > > > > Hopkins undergraduate/Homewood campus and I can say that if the
> > > > > new
> > > > Sun Ray
> > > > > models can do better with video than the current generation, that
> > > will
> > > > weigh
> > > > > heavily in favor of the Sun Ray.  While I have not yet personally
> > > seen
> > > > them,
> > > > > I have heard reports that a demo of HP thin clients (which are
> > > > probably not
> > > > > as thin) worked well on the video front.
> > > > >
> > > > > William Yang
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:sunray-users-
> > > > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent Peacock
> > > > >> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:37 PM
> > > > >> To: SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Sun Ray 3 Plus in Google cache
> > > > >> archives
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 03/25/10 19:10, David Koelmeyer wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Livery needs some work :P
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> But seriously, excited to see this - sure hope it's got some
> > > > >>> decent graphics processing built into it.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> Why? What do you plan to do with i?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kent--
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > Dave Koelmeyer
> > > > ==
> > > > Senior IT Technician
> > > > Faculty of Engineering Administration, University of Auckland
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SunRay-Users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to