Accepted! :)
And I apologize for spelling "are" as "our" (That's pretty bad).
John Francis wrote:
Yes I realise that now, and it's great to hear that desktop Linux is
still a priority. Apologies to you Oracle folks for jumping the gun.
On 6 July 2010 10:35, Craig Bender <[email protected]> wrote:
I wouldn't say that Oracle isn't interested in this problem, we indeed our.
As the Exec VP in charge of Sun Ray Wim Coekaerts wrote in a message to
this very group regarding libflashsupport "we'll get it fixed one way or the
other tho."
John Francis wrote:
Looks like neither Adobe nor Oracle are really interested in this
problem. I think SRSS is mainly deployed in VDI or simple uttsc
scenarios and so desktop Linux is the least of Oracle's concern. I
know it is not a bug on their side, but looking at the bug reports
they don't even seem to be asking Adobe to address the issue.
It is a shame because managing just two or three Linux desktop session
servers for a couple of hundred users is far more efficient and easier
than any of the full blown VDI solutions I've looked at.
As for Adobe, it's odd that they fixed it in the 9 series. It was a
problem initially, it was reported and subsequently fixed. If it was
worth fixing in the 9 series, why is it not worth giving any attention
to in version 10? They must have fixed it in 9 after the branch was
made for the version 10 code-base, or maybe 10 started with a clean
code-base.
On 6 July 2010 08:58, Murray Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:
Has there been any response from Adobe?
I seem to be getting more and more reports of sites requiring an up to
date version of flash player, as I'm still running the v9.0 release.
- Murray
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Wim Coekaerts
<[email protected]> wrote:
We will contact adobe again. I saw the bug you filed.
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-3929
if I get info ll post it to the list.
Wim
On 06/10/2010 04:20 PM, Murray Fraser wrote:
Since Adobe havn't able to fix the color masks for flash player 10.1,
how much trouble would it be for it to be changed on the Sun Ray X
server, so that it uses the 'red, green, blue = 0xff0000, 0xff00 0xff'
colour masks that Adobe assumes.
Perhaps this could be an option for utxconfig.
- Murray
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
