On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Craig Bender <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/24/11 7:19 AM, Art Peck wrote: >> I'm seeing many occurances of: >> Jan 24 03:03:15 [172.16.14.211.2.21] 0x0.0x6ec757c 0:21:28:3b:9:6c >> Application: badlist_check 172.16.1.6 0 >> in my messages file. > > Have you asked the customer if they have any type of site checking scripts > to keep users away from certain websites. Looks like a black listed site > utility to me. Nothing I'm aware of on the SRSS side.
That report is coming from the DTU firmware. It's not a common message, which is probably why you didn't recognise it. The firmware maintains a list of Sun Ray servers that have refused to accept this DTU in the recent past, and it will skip those servers if it needs to try to find a new server. The idea is to prevent the DTU from wasting time trying to talk to a server that isn't going to accept the DTU anyway. The message is coming from the logic that manages that list but I'd have to look at the source to find out what this exact message means. If the reporting level on the DTU has been turned up then this might just be a progress message rather than something that needs action from the admin. Is 172.16.1.6 the address of a Sun Ray server? If not then I'd be wondering about why the DTU decided to try to contact that address. If that is a server and it would be expected to accept this DTU then I'd probably take a quick look to see that its configuration is sane, and maybe skim its Sun Ray log files for signs of trouble. OttoM. __ Disclaimer: I am employed by Oracle. The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation. _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
