I was a bit quick to respond a minute ago and I've now done a bit of reading about MTU and sunrays. Would you recommend setting the value via the DHCP option 26?
Thanks again for this excellent hint! Erin Erin Powers wrote: > Hi OttoM, > > Thanks for the tidbit! Sure enough, the disconnected sessions are > reconnected with a lower MTU value. My only problem now is I'm not sure > what to do with this juicy bit of information... Is there any way I can > force a lower value from the initial connection or set a higher > tolerance for change or is that just crazy talk? Ultimately, my goal is > to get rid of the "random" disconnects. > > Thanks again, > Erin > > > ottomeister wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Erik Riedel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Unfortunately I didn't find the source of this problem. Only thing I >>> recognized is that sometimes only one user gets locked and >>> sometimes several users get locked. >>> >>> >> One thing you (both) might check is whether the 'MTU' attribute >> in the /var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages logfile records for the >> affected DTUs has different values before the unexpected >> disconnect and after the subsequent reconnect. If the DTU >> experiences IP fragmentation it will lower its MTU and will >> force a disconnect+reconnect cycle in order to force the new >> value to be adopted by the server. >> >> OttoM. >> __ >> Disclaimer: I am employed by Oracle. The statements and opinions >> expressed here are my own and do not necessarily represent those >> of Oracle Corporation. >> _______________________________________________ >> SunRay-Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users > _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
