Doh... It's "getconf CLK_TCK" Not getopt. Sorry.
On 5/17/11 8:03 AM, Fuerle, Thomas wrote:
Hi Craig, these are my Sun Ray Server settings you might be interested. I have
also created a ticket, so support can digg into this.
-bash-3.00# tail /etc/system
* optimize clock
set hires_ticks=1
-bash-3.00# getopt CLK_TCK (after reboot)
--
-bash-3.00# utxconfig -l -a
DIMENSIONS=auto
ENABLE_PSEUDOCOLOR_VISUAL=no
DEFAULT_PSEUDOCOLOR_VISUAL=no
ENABLE_MULTISCREEN=yes
ENABLE_XINERAMA=no
ENABLE_XKB=no
SCREEN_GEOMETRY=auto
SCREEN_ORDER=auto
XSERVER_PREF=Xnewt
QUICK_ABORT=yes
XRENDER=yes
regards, thomas
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Craig Bender
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Mai 2011 15:16
An: SunRay-Users mailing list
Betreff: Re: [SunRay-Users] 5.2 released ... slow display refresh
Greetings Thomas,
If you're not seeing packet loss, the hires change won't do anything.
But to be sure it's in effect, what does getconf CLK_TCK report?
Regarding the slow draw in general:
Once again a request to open calls if you haven't done so and are seeing this
issue. If you have opened one, ¡muchas gracias!
This issue has been replicated by engineering and is being worked.
Regarding the problem being client related, while that sounds logical given
your tests, it doesn't rule out the server side. The interaction between the
client, the server, and even the OS that is being displayed (due to things like
Flash, RCA acceleration) all has to be looked at.
All of it it percolates up through or somehow interacts with Xserver.
In this case, I would agree that the issue appears below (above?) the RDP or
X11 layer, meaning it happens regardless of what you are displaying, but the
real problem could still be at the Xserver layer.
On 5/17/11 5:49 AM, Fuerle, Thomas wrote:
ad slow display refresh:
I have set /etc/system like 'set hires_tick=1', did not change much, at least
nothing I noticed.
But somebody hinted running 5.2 with the old 5.1.2 firmware seems to
be a good approach. So I connected to my production Sun Ray server,
which is 5.1.2 and did a force of a downgrade of the firmware via
utfwadm -A -e MAC -F -f /opt/SUNWut/lib/firmware_gui
terminalID=MAC
terminalIPA=IP Adrress
model=SunRayP9
currentAuth=current Auth server
currentFW=GUI4.2_140993-07_2010.12.30.17.25
currentBarrier=422
currentBarrierLevel=422
currentMTU=1500
Subnet=255.255.0.0
Router=current Router
LeaseTim=604800
DHCPServer=current DHCP
INFORMServer=current INFORM
tftpSrvr=current tftpSrvr
FWservType=conf
speed=100F
parmsVersion=GUI4.2_140993-07_2010.12.30.17.25
parmsBarrier=422
configMTU=1500
dnsList=current DNS servers
dname=current dname
confNetType=DHCP
confTftpSrvr=current tftp
conf.fulldup=1
confServers=current conf server
stopqon=0
bandwidth=100000000
poweroff=30
did go back to the firmware GUI and changed server to servername of srs5.2,
while keept firmware server to the current prod 5.1.2 and rebootet.
so far this combination seems to work nice as I already know it, which
is subjective, but that's just my feeling,
So my conclusion would be that something in the firmware is the hand brake or
broken, which would explain, why it is independent from the client OS you
running to connect to.
regards, thomas
-bash-3.00#
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Craig Bender
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 17:20
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [SunRay-Users] 5.2 released
Got it. Sorry, I incorrectly assumed Putty was only available for
Windows. Is it lame that gnome-terminal meets my needs? ;)
First, if you have support, please open a case so we can track it from a
development side.
There are a few people responding, all with different scenarios, which all
could be different issues. For Win7/2008R2 via MS-RDP, it's possible that RCA
is kicking in. Adding -D to uttsc would be an interesting test to run.
I believe there are some new features in 5.2 that could affect drawing, though
I would expect them to be positive impacts. I want to double check with the
developer before I claim new features that may or not have made the cut as I
don't seem them in the release notes, nor do I see a way to change the one that
is suspect in my mind.
In the meantime, if folks could gather the following information. If you are
not comfortable with putting this information on the list, please give the
information to Oracle Support.
-Note if settings /etc/system like 'set hires_tick=1' are enabled.
-Any settings in the parms files (if used) -Provide a utquery of DTUs
exhibiting this behavior -Describe the network, both on server and
client side -Any packet loss detected with utcapture -MTU settings
agreed upon between server and client...and whether that matches a
ping test for max MTU
(http://blogs.oracle.com/ThinkThin/entry/the_importance_of_mtu)
On 5/16/11 6:53 AM, Philippe Bourdeu d'Aguerre wrote:
Le lundi 16 mai 2011, [email protected] a écrit :
Isn't putty windows?
I have a plain (not virtalized) CentOS server running SRSS 5.2 and
Sunrays connecting to it with Gnome or KDE CentOS sessions on the same server.
Refresh is randomly slow.
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
