I got this confirmed by support ...

You appear to be hitting a new SRS 5.2 bug - 12578874
Synopsis: SLOW DISPLAY REFRESH/REDRAW HAPPENS AFTER UPGRADE TO SRS 5.2
Engineering is involved.
The workaround is to use the firmware from your previous release provided it 
was 5.1.1 or 5.1.2.

So we both know what to do ...

The potential HW Bug in the Sun Ray 3 concerns me also, as we have recently 
startet to rollout the first 3 ones here. Let me see, what I get for a feedback 
from the users here.

regards, thomas

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jens Langner
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2011 17:29
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [SunRay-Users] 5.2 released ... slow display refresh

Hi Thomas,

good that you reference my SR as well. Lets hope that this speeds up progress 
of engineering when fixing the issue. FW in 5.2 is really too slow to be 
practically usable.

Here, we are running now SRS 5.2 with FW of SRS 5.1.2 in our production 
environment (two Solaris 10 systems) and everything seems to work smoothly now 
that we have the older FW running.

However, our SR3 clients (not plus) are still suffering from regular hardware 
resets when receiving certain network traffic. But this issue is tracked under 
a different SR #3-2756461385 and is not related to the latest FW. To me this 
pretty much looks like a hardware bug in the SR3 as our SR3+ don't seem to have 
that problem.

best regards,
jens

Am 24.05.11 16:29, schrieb Fuerle, Thomas:
> no progress so far in my TAR, it's on Prio 2 and escalated it, refering also 
> your TAR 3-3673862291. I'm running currently on SRS 5.2 with the Firmware of 
> SRS 5.1.2 on my Test Sun Ray Server. No plans so far to upgrade production as 
> long as this does not fix.
> 
> regards, thomas
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jens Langner
> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Mai 2011 18:26
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [SunRay-Users] 5.2 released ... slow display refresh
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I also had the same problem with our 115 SunRays after having upgraded them 
> to FW 4.3 and SRS 5.2. Now we are back to FW 4.2 from december running on SRS 
> 5.2 and everything is working smoothly again.
> 
> I also opened a SR #3-3673862291 on support.oracle.com against SRS.
> Let's hope that problem will be fixed shortly and new firmwares will be 
> distributed.
> 
> best regards,
> jens
> 
> Am 17.05.11 14:49, schrieb Fuerle, Thomas:
>> ad slow display refresh: 
>>
>> I have set /etc/system like 'set hires_tick=1', did not change much, at 
>> least nothing I noticed.
>>
>> But somebody hinted running 5.2 with the  old 5.1.2 firmware seems to 
>> be a good approach. So I connected to my production Sun Ray server, 
>> which is 5.1.2 and did a force of a downgrade of the firmware via
>>
>> utfwadm -A -e MAC -F -f /opt/SUNWut/lib/firmware_gui
>>
>> terminalID=MAC
>>         terminalIPA=IP Adrress
>>         model=SunRayP9
>>         currentAuth=current Auth server
>>         currentFW=GUI4.2_140993-07_2010.12.30.17.25
>>         currentBarrier=422
>>         currentBarrierLevel=422
>>         currentMTU=1500
>>         Subnet=255.255.0.0
>>         Router=current Router
>>         LeaseTim=604800
>>         DHCPServer=current DHCP
>>         INFORMServer=current INFORM
>>         tftpSrvr=current tftpSrvr
>>         FWservType=conf
>>         speed=100F
>>         parmsVersion=GUI4.2_140993-07_2010.12.30.17.25
>>         parmsBarrier=422
>>         configMTU=1500
>>         dnsList=current DNS servers
>>         dname=current dname
>>         confNetType=DHCP
>>         confTftpSrvr=current tftp
>>         conf.fulldup=1
>>         confServers=current conf server
>>         stopqon=0
>>         bandwidth=100000000
>>         poweroff=30
>>
>> did go back to the firmware GUI and changed server to servername of srs5.2, 
>> while keept firmware server to the current prod 5.1.2 and rebootet.
>>
>> so far this combination seems to work nice as I already know it, 
>> which is subjective, but that's just my feeling,
>>
>> So my conclusion would be that something in the firmware is the hand brake 
>> or broken, which would explain, why it is independent from the client OS you 
>> running to connect to.
>>
>> regards, thomas
>>
>> -bash-3.00#
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Craig 
>> Bender
>> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 17:20
>> An: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: [SunRay-Users] 5.2 released
>>
>> Got it.  Sorry, I incorrectly assumed Putty was only available for 
>> Windows.  Is it lame that gnome-terminal meets my needs?  ;)
>>
>> First, if you have support, please open a case so we can track it from a 
>> development side.
>>
>> There are a few people responding, all with different scenarios, which all 
>> could be different issues.  For Win7/2008R2 via MS-RDP, it's possible that 
>> RCA is kicking in.  Adding -D to uttsc would be an interesting test to run.
>>
>> I believe there are some new features in 5.2 that could affect drawing, 
>> though I would expect them to be positive impacts.  I want to double check 
>> with the developer before I claim new features that may or not have made the 
>> cut as I don't seem them in the release notes, nor do I see a way to change 
>> the one that is suspect in my mind.
>>
>> In the meantime, if folks could gather the following information.  If you 
>> are not comfortable with putting this information on the list, please give 
>> the information to Oracle Support.
>>
>> -Note if settings /etc/system like 'set hires_tick=1' are enabled.
>> -Any settings in the parms files (if used) -Provide a utquery of DTUs 
>> exhibiting this behavior -Describe the network, both on server and 
>> client side -Any packet loss detected with utcapture -MTU settings 
>> agreed upon between server and client...and whether that matches a 
>> ping test for max MTU
>> (http://blogs.oracle.com/ThinkThin/entry/the_importance_of_mtu)
>>
>> On 5/16/11 6:53 AM, Philippe Bourdeu d'Aguerre wrote:
>>> Le lundi 16 mai 2011, [email protected] a écrit :
>>>> Isn't putty windows?
>>>>
>>> I have a plain (not virtalized) CentOS server running SRSS 5.2 and 
>>> Sunrays connecting to it with Gnome or KDE CentOS sessions on the same 
>>> server.
>>> Refresh is randomly slow.
>> _______________________________________________
>> SunRay-Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> SunRay-Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Dr. Jens Langner                                     Ph: +49-351-2602757
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Institute of Radiopharmacy - PET Center                [email protected]
Germany                                              http://www.hzdr.de/
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to