Cheers Jamie, I think we can all loosely translate that as 'Hey, Rob, Chill out man!' :^) > -----Original Message----- > From: Jamie King [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 2:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SS: the stuff of treason? > > >Hi all, > > Here,s JK,s $1.25 worth of dribble for the day - > > > What I think Sunscreem missed was the oportunity to lead the way on the = > > >current "Trance" sound that is very much in dominance. > > I know that trance is a very, very general term for any particular > sub-spoke of dance and techno, but as far as I was concerned - NDT was the > best chunk of progressive trance I had heard for many a year - and guess > what - it actually achieved it,s goal - it let me go 'trancing", pulling > me > up into the blue. > Still their finest piece of work to date - in my books. And not because it > invited me to dinner, but because it served up perfectly as desert. > > > I think that if the band had not been busy in other = > > >countries > > Cheeky bastards, and they still havn,t found their way to Australia yet - > jeez, what,s a boy have to do? > > > they would have realised that a great deal of what they have = > > >done in the past would easily be remixed by the big names now - and = > > >Sunscreem would be a household name again. > > I don,t think the Andy Warhol type of recognition would work for SS. Too > much controversy and scandell - I can see the tabloids now - "The cult of > E - lock up your children - ectasy endorsment and repetitive rhythm claims > thousands - prophets of the armageddon lead our youth into anarchy". > > > > > > > > >weeks ago, Scott Bond last week, Danny Rampling last wednesday, Tall = > > >Paul in 3 weeks and Boy George on Sunday. > > But where,s Sasha and Digs heh? > (looking at buying some land in Antarctica - or so I heard) > > > >non of the big big name DJ's are going to play this track. > > They will in years to come - as do they all - (my point of referance is > obvious when you look at what SS tracks turn up on compilations, and in > what > time bracket). > > And that can = > > >only mean low sales for Sunscreem - further de-moralisation for the = > > >band, > > Who gives a shit, unless the band are extremely unhappy without their > millions, or the 'core' fan base is not catered to. > > and even less consistency of material released. > > Remember Rob - it,s not how big it is........... > > And if my memory serves me right - you were the first person that I > remember > , who used those eternal lyrics from 'when' as a tag on the end of your > mail. > > 'trust in love to save' > > jamie k > > > ********************************************************* > You are being sent this message because you > are subscribed to the Sunscreem Mailing List. > For help send the message text: help > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ********************************************************* ********************************************************* You are being sent this message because you are subscribed to the Sunscreem Mailing List. For help send the message text: help to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *********************************************************
