Hi Karsten, Thanks for the comment, please see reply inline [FP].
> > I think the solution area should be extended by another possibility to embed > IPv4 addresses in v6, as the /96 version has to use the hex version of the ID, [FP] Perhaps we can use the mixed notation, e.g. 2001:db8::192.168.255.1? > the use of a /80 could be used to store them in a format like > 2001:db8::1921:6825:5001 or 2001:db8::0102:5525:0001. > If you like to use an even better readable approach you can also use a /64 for > addresses like 2001:db8::192:168:255:1. [FP] Yes these approaches are quite human-friendly, thanks. [FP] We can also consider if there is another solution besides address mapping and other ideas in the draft. Best regards, Peng > > Regards > Karsten > _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
