Sorry for late response, George. Yes, newer draft supersede the older one. It's appreciated if you can help me to connect them. In addition If there is meeting in Dallas, I would like to apply for a time slot. Thank you.
regards, Davey On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:05 AM, George, Wes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi - > > I gave this draft a quick review in preparation for identifying what we > might discuss in our next meeting in Dallas. > > It is unclear to me what the relationship is between draft-song-sunset4 > and draft-davey-sunset4, and I think they should probably be integrated > into one draft. Or does the newer draft supersede the other? If the one > supersedes the other, I can send mail to the secretariat so that the > metadata reflects that. > > Either way, there are additional things to discuss in this space, such > as the interaction between the DNS server, IPv4 transition/life extension > technologies, address selection, and happy eyeballs. Some of it is covered > in draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00, but I'm not certain what the status of > that draft is. > > The problem statement we discussed at a DHC/Sunset4 joint meeting was as > follows: > •Many networks will have both IPv4 and IPv6, but with varying transition > technologies affecting the quality of those stacks > –“real” IPv4 (no CGN) > –CGN IPv4 (potentially broken for some apps) > –NAT64/DNS64 (also potentially breaks things) > –IPv6 (only) > •How do you tell dual-stack hosts which to use/avoid? > –For which destinations? > –With which protocol(s)? > –Happy Eyeballs helps, but can be non-deterministic > > > Thanks, > > > > Wes > > > > > From: Davey Song <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, October 27, 2014 at 9:00 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [sunset4] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-song-sunset4-ipv6only-dns-00.txt > > Hi folks, I have just post a new draft on IPv6-only DNS development. > Comments are welcome!! > > A new version of I-D, draft-song-sunset4-ipv6only-dns-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Linjian Song and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-song-sunset4-ipv6only-dns > Revision: 00 > Title: Considerations on IPv6-only DNS Development > Document date: 2014-10-27 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 8 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-song-sunset4-ipv6only-dns-00.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-sunset4-ipv6only-dns/ > Htmlized: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-sunset4-ipv6only-dns-00 > > > Abstract: > Deployment of IPv6-only networks are impacted by assumptions of > IPv4-only or dual-stack transition scenarios. For example, these > assumptions are in the operations of DNS. This memo is problem > statement and hopes to eventually propose a mitigation technique. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > ------------------------------ > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you > are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that > any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to > the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and > may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify > the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of > this E-mail and any printout. >
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
