Hi, I recently submitted an I-D draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00.txt, mandating use of IPv6 in examples in RFCs.
I was reading some pretty recent drafts and noticed that authors continue using IPv4 in their examples. This is probably more convenient, but is not really forward thinking. Also, the prevalence of IPv6 examples will send a strong message that IPv4 is essentially a legacy protocol. I wonder if this WG is interested in progressing this document as a WG item. Thanks, Andrei > Name: draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples > Revision: 00 > Title: Mandating use of IPv6 in examples > Document date: 2016-03-21 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 3 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples/ > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00 > > > Abstract: > IPv6 is a successor of the legacy IPv4 protocol. This document > mandates use of IPv6 in examples provided in RFCs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list sunset4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
