Hi, I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will explicitly support IPv6" activities?
Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09"; specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework work should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature rich vs. IPv4. Jacques -----Original Message----- From: sunset4 [mailto:sunset4-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee Howard Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM To: MarcBlanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca> Cc: draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-i...@ietf.org; sunset4@ietf.org Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf Lol I know of no IPR related to this draft. Lee Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca> wrote: > > Dear author, > please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR related to > this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, was it disclosed, > in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79. > > Regards, Marc, document shepherd > > _______________________________________________ > sunset4 mailing list > sunset4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 > _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list sunset4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list sunset4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
