On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:25:06 -0800, Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> wrote: > On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:10:39 -0800 (PST), Nicolas Pouillard > <nicolas.pouill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sup-cmd count 'is:inbox' > > > sup-cmd query --offset 10 --limit 5 'is:unread' > > > sup-cmd label --add-labels 'bugs' --remove-labels 'inbox' 'is:inbox AND > > > from:bugzilla' > > > sup-cmd add --labels 'sent' < email > > > > This is great! > > > > BTW is there any hope to reach a kind of concensus of a nice CLI API with > > notmuch people? > > It seems to me, at least, like that would be a worthwhile effort. > > I still consider the notmuch UI young enough that it's still quite > flexible. And I'm here on the sup list if we want to talk here. > > For reference, the rough equivalent of the above commands in notmuch > would be (with footnotes where things don't match exactly): > > notmuch count 'tag:inbox' > notmuch search 'tag:unread' [*] > notmuch tag +bugs -inbox 'tag:inbox AND from:bugzilla' > notmuch new [**]
About the sup-cmd label vs notmuch tag commands, I prefer the notmuch syntax. Moreover an alias could be added to both to unify between label and tag. > So, I obviously switched from "label" to "tag" when I moved from sup to > notmuch. But I do like the "is:" prefix---I can easily see adding that > at least. Yes please add the is: prefix too, tag: was added to sup. Regards, -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
