Excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of Wed May 12 00:44:29 -0400 2010: > Not at all. If you do that, I'll switch to rotating inbox.
Cool! > > [1] This is along the lines of my 'patterned/dynamic source' idea > > that I briefly described a few nights back, but I think that was > > eaten... > > Patterned/dynamic/recursive sources are in my todo-list. Haven't > got around implementing it yet. Gave it some thought though. Did > you consider them "virtual" (as in bunch of "physical" maildir/mbox > stores made transparently look like one source) or "meta" (as in > template source which sup uses to generate a set of "physical" > sources)? Which one would be better? I was thinking meta, but virtual is interesting too. I _think_ that meta would be easier to implement given the current code structure. I also think having each of the 'dynamic' sources listed explicitly in sources.yaml has some merit. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
