Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-01-27: > I'm http://gitorious.org/~terotil
Added! And now I can ignore all your outstanding patch requests. :) > > All I ask is that you divide things into nice topic branches and > > merge them into next but not master. > > Do you prefer basing feature branches to master or next? Base them off of master, please. If they're based off of next, I can't merge them into master without also merging all of next. > Should we prefix feature branch names to keep `git branch` more > readable? They could be topic-* or feature-* or alike. I don't think that's necessary. The only two integration branches are master and next (and the release-* branches, I suppose). When I merge things into master I will delete the remote branches as well, so we shouldn't end up with a big mess. -- William <wmorgan-...@masanjin.net> _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
