On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:29:07 +0000, William Morgan <wmorgan-...@masanjin.net> wrote: > Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-02-22: > > I guess this offers the possibility to add threading to "external state" > > of messages, together with labels. I'd do a whole a lot of more > > prune'n'crafting with my threads if there only was more comfortable > > interface to doing it (admit it, been too lazy to implement it in sup). > > Not quite sure I follow, but the intention is certainly to allow clients to > create and break threads and to present labels as per-thread, rather than > per-message, data.
I would not go for "labels on threads" only, here is a list of labels that are more message based than thread based: unread, starred, draft, sent, attachment. And while it would make sense to have special cases for those this also prevents from user defined per message labels. -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
