Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Tue Feb 22 21:29:07 +0000 2011: > Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2011-02-22: > > Would it be time to go for https://github.com/mikel/mail now? It would be > > supported and actively developed and I really like the API. As a > > downside, depending on activesupport pulls in a whole a lot of fluff and > > using treetop may suggest that parsing might hog a little more cpu and > > memory than is absolutely necessary. > > I looked at it, but the dependency on activesupport is a dealbreaker for me. > There's no way I would pull that pile of Rails shit into Sup.
Might be a bit late, but I've just noticed that they're taking the activesupport dependency out, as of mail 2.3.0 http://rubygems.org/gems/mail/versions/2.3.0 - no activesupport On github, the gemspec no longer refers to it: https://github.com/mikel/mail/blob/master/mail.gemspec though the Gemfile still does ... I think this is an oversight. https://github.com/mikel/mail/blob/master/Gemfile A couple of commits doing the work: https://github.com/mikel/mail/commit/6eb4c44a15eb1707dde60959e85e5c536ef136e2 https://github.com/mikel/mail/commit/8bea8ede624e81fb4704e66097a1c8cf35f8de8d > RMail is not great and I don't like using it, but it really is the best > thing I've found so far. I think I have whipped it into shape pretty well in > heliotrope. > > > Who would give us bindings to GMime and wrap it inside Mail API... > > I would use GMime bindings in a heartbeat. Hamish _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
