Maybe William can help out? https://twitter.com/wm/status/323175493367119873
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <j...@thejof.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Gaute Hope <e...@gaute.vetsj.com> wrote: >> If we go sup2 I would suggest the following plan: >> >> - Release the best we can get with the current code for 1.9.3 as a last >> community release of sup-0.12, say.. sup-0.13. >> >> For sup2: >> - Fork a new repo: sup2 >> - Go for Mail in stead of RMail (index breakage) >> - Go for only Psych (config breakage), requires psych gem in 1.8 >> - Integrate the IMAP / label sync back stuff (personally this is what I >> miss the most) >> - Go for ruby 2.0.0 and maybe 1.8 >> - Get rid of all dependencies that are abandoned or deprecated (ncurses >> gem..) > > And target ncursesw? > >> - Try to do tests on most stuff for different encodings >> - Try to get UTF-8 / encoding right >> - Move all the rest of the infrastructure to something the project is in >> control of >> >> Would be very nice: >> - Index migration >> - Config migration >> >> For the web page (eventually): >> - note about the original project >> - note about the last sup-0.13 release >> - wiki and project page for sup2 >> >> This plan more or less holds whether we go sup2 or not, but I think it >> is easier to get rid of the hopeless dependencies. > > I agree that it's worth it to drop unmaintained dependencies and just > fix what breaks. > It would be unfortunate to have to fork the project and make a > different name. I wonder if Morgan has lost interest or is just busy > with other things. > > Cheers, > jof >> @sup-devel readers: discussion is currently at sup-talk, please send any >> responses there. >> >> Regards, Gaute >> >> On 13. april 2013 19:14, Gaute Hope wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 13. april 2013 18:35, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Gaute Hope <e...@gaute.vetsj.com> wrote: >>>>> On la. 13. april 2013 kl. 12.09 +0200, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Gaute Hope <e...@gaute.vetsj.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan: I put your commit into a pull request at: >>>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/19 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, re-branding and updating to web-references: >>>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> any comments on this? You can see the changes I made. I have absolutely >>>>>>> no intentions of stepping on any toes, but this is a suggestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, thank you very much! That looks great! >>>>>> >>>>>>> It is a pity that the official home page and probably first search >>>>>>> results direct to the abandoned home and gem of sup. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is too bad. Hopefully William could hand off access or at least >>>>>> push updates somehow. >>>>>> >>>>>> If not, maybe we could stand up another domain pointing to github pages? >>>>>> Looks like supmua.org and supm.ua are available. :p >>>>>> >>>>>> --j >>>>> >>>>> Yeah.. I think some web page is pretty essential, perhaps just the >>>>> standard github-pages domain for a start. Anyone feel up for the task, >>>>> I'd be happy to add you to the github-organization. >>>> >>>> Agreed. I snagged supmua.org for a year, and have it pointing at >>>> sup-heliotrope.github.io for pages. >>>> >>>> Stick me on the org, and I'll see about getting a simple site started. >>> >>> Nice. You're on. >>> >>> Cheers, Gaute >>> _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
