Excerpts from Marcus Williams's message of Wed Nov 07 08:34:32 -0800 2007: > Got it - in is_relevant you changed the patch to use "&&" instead of > "and" and I think this broke it because of the precedence of "&&" > makes it do
Good catch. Fixed in SVN. (Still refusing to use "and" though :) ) -- William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
