Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Thu Jan 24 23:03:58 -0500 2008: > I don't think so... you can apply the patch below and see exactly what > Sup is sending sendmail. In my case, that header is intact. So it must > be getting overwritten somewhere else in the system. > > There's some crazy interaction between this header, the From: and > Sender: headers, and the -f option of sendmail. Maybe you should use a > -f with sendmail (in your ~/.sup/config.yaml file)? Did you have a > particular way of calling sendmail with Mutt?
Right you are about the crazy interaction. It's not clear to me how Mutt is calling sendmail, but now I'm guessing all that the "set envelope_from=yes" does in mutt is add the -f flag followed by one's "from" email to the call to sendmail. If I do that in my ~/.sup/config.yaml, the return-path is set correctly (at least, it was in my tests. How does this message look?!). In fact, I believe it's set correctly even if I don't set the return-path in ~/.sup/hooks/edit-before.rb or patch lib/mbox.rb. In other words, all that needs to be done to fix my problem is the addition of -f <email> to the sendmail call. Maybe it could be an option in the initial account setup? Oh, and thanks for all the work you're doing on sup, William. Really great stuff. _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
