marc.hartstein wrote:
> Excerpts from its.jeff.balogh's message of Thu Apr 24 01:23:10 -0400 2008:
> > I prefer to reply to a mailing list, then all participants:
> > 
> >   $ cat .sup/hooks/reply-to.rb
> >   ([:list, :all] & types)[0]
> 
> Neat.  For reference for anybody interested in using this, possible
> values are in lib/sup/modes/reply-mode.rb:5
> 
> :sender => "Sender",
> :recipient => "Recipient",
> :all => "All",
> :list => "Mailing list",
> :user => "Customized"
> 
> The default behavior should be equivalent [see line 97] to
> ([:list, :sender, :recipient] & types)[0]

Thanks.  Your documentation skills far exceed mine. :)

> Is there a reason you ended up going with a hook?

1. Laziness.
2. Reluctance to add to config.
3. Because I expected someone might want to be fancier, maybe getting the
message for fuller processing.

> I wonder if the hook should be provided with the current message for
> fuller processing.

If you (or anyone) finds that useful, we can add it.  I left it out to keep the
hook simple.
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

Reply via email to