Excerpts from Eduardo Habkost's message of Thu Nov 06 15:33:23 +0100 2008: > Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Wed Nov 05 15:48:34 -0200 2008: > > Reformatted excerpts from Decklin Foster's message of 2008-11-02: > > > This just happened again. Should I put it into ditz or something? (I > > > feel exceedingly lame, but I don't have time to debug it today > > > either.) > > > > No. Sadly, this is one of the innumerable Ferret errors that crop up > > from time to time, which spurred STS. > > I've been easily reproducing crashes similar to this one. The only thing > I need to reproduce it is making sure I load another label while sup is > still polling for new messages. > > If I deliver a lot of new messages to a maildir source and don't run > sup-sync, sup will spend a few seconds loading the new messages and > there is plenty of time to hit L, go to a label (I don't know if it > needs to be the same label the new messages being loaded are getting), > and see the crash.
I rarely use 'L', however I often search for particular set of mails using '\', maybe it's a general problem with search during poll. In this case perhaps making sup a little bit more sequential would make it more robust (this could help us to wait for STS). Best regards, -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
