Excerpts from Daniel Wagner's message of Tue Jan 13 23:36:09 +0000 2009: > Excerpts from marianne.promberger+sup-talk's message of Thu Jan 08 14:51:37 > -0500 2009: > > I'm thinking specifically about using "&" to kill a thread from thread-view > > Try hitting '.' or ',' first. There are two reasonable actions after > dealing with a message, either returning to the inbox or moving to the > next message. '.' selects the former; ',' the latter.
No, it doesn't work for killing the thread, that key is not available in thread-view-mode on my sup 0.6. I can do other things after hitting "." or ",", like archiving or marking as read, but not kill a thread. Incidentally, I'd also think it would be even better to have either returning to the inbox or moving to the next message the default and let the user use keys like "a" directly, in addition to being able to pick a desired behavior by prepending "." or "," explicitly. It's just much harder to be aware all the time of which mode you're in than always hitting "a" to archive. Similarly, I think it's a terrible idea that "S" is bound to "mark as spam" when I'm in the inbox or search-results mode, but search for messages from that person when I'm in thread-view mode. It's not all that unreasonable to want to search for mail from a particular person directly on a single message in the inbox or when viewing search results. Marking as spam would be particularly bad if that is hooked to some behavior like piping the message to train spamassassin. > > mode, and of "A" or "a" to archive a thread from search-results-mode. > > Are you sure this doesn't work? It works here (admittedly on an ancient > version of sup, so the keybindings may have changed). Sorry, I only tested "A", since I always use that from the inbox mode. "a" works, "A" doesn't. Thanks, Marianne _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
