Reformatted excerpts from Edward Z. Yang's message of 2009-06-08:
> * How do I tell if a message is shown on the screen or not?

If m is the message, @layout[m].state will be :open, :detailed or
:closed. If it's not :closed, it is visible.

> * The implementation you describe still downloads the messages
> sequentially, which are usually not the messages we want to download
> first.

Only if you add them to the Queue sequentially. You could instead add
the ones with :unread or :starred labels first. And ideally if you
expand a collapsed unloaded message, that should be pushed to the head
of the Queue.

> I don't mind sup blocking on downloading a message, as long
> as it's one or two, which means I don't strictly need threads: I
> just need some API for, when a new message is opened, downloading it
> and then rendering it.  What do you think of this?

So you would only preload the new/starred ones, and load the others only
when they're expanded? I think that simply removing that call in
thread-index-mode.rb would accomplish this.

I'd rather have the threaded version, since loading a thread of 100 new
messages sucks, but either way would be an improvement.

> > The auto-completion is awesome. Adding a recipient to the contacts
> > list is a good idea.
> 
> Does contacts.rb apply to people.txt or contacts.txt?

contacts.txt. people.txt is deprecated. In fact I'm surprised you have
one.

> > It's definitely worse than O(n). Loading threads could be sped up
> > dramatically by storing the thread structure somewhere (either
> > cached or just for every thread), since Sup does a lot of extra work
> > rethreading everything every time you start it up. FWIW I'm doing
> > this the right way in Sup 2.0.
> 
> Can you backport it easily to Sup 1.0?

No, it's completely different. It would be easier to rewrite from
scratch for the existing Sup.

> The explicit prompt makes me think about who I want to send the
> message to. I frequently forget to move the little knob with Sup's
> behavior.

When do you want it to prompt you? Is this a yes/no prompt?
-- 
William <wmorgan-...@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

Reply via email to