Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon Jun 15 13:24:08 -0400 2009:

> Sorry for the delay. This looks good. Using a mutex to protect the
> file-locking seems like the right idea. Carry on!

Yah, now that 'stupid Kobe' beat the Magic last night, my evenings
should have more time for completing this.  I'm just about finished
integrating it with the mbox code.

I've branched this from bw/flexible_sent, since I thought it made more
sense to go from that than from master w/o the flexible sent
parts...it should still merge decently for you, I think.

The next hurdle will be testing, which I'll need help for, since my
only mbox is sup://sent, which is now legacy only (and at some point
when I'm bored will disappear completely).

Thanks
-Ben
-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk

Reply via email to