Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Sun Nov 01 18:30:04 +0100 2009: > Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-11-01: > > What I found cool about distributed bugtrackers is that the > > bug-closing action can follow the code that fixes the bug. Being in a > > branch, or being reviewed... > > > > About non-technical users, I think that just a mail (thread) on the > > mailing-list could suffice. Of course some web app can make things > > clearer. > > It's funny, the two things that I found irritating do were a) close the > bug as part of the commit (because I kept forgetting, and also because I > like reading commits with git log -p and the ditz stuff was additional > noise), and
I think some habits are needed in each model... > b) translating a user's bug report email into an issue. :) Yes this translating job can really be boring. In fact I consider every bugtracker related task to be boring... And yes the nice part of web based bugtracker is to put this burden on the user. -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
