On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:34:24AM -0500, Mike Kelly wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:16:15 -0800, William Morgan > <wmorgan-...@masanjin.net> wrote: > > Reformatted excerpts from Mike Kelly's message of 2009-11-03: > >> As much as I hate to suggest it... RT should have all of these > >> qualities. > > > > Rrrrrrrrreally. Is it a pain to set up? Why do you hate to suggest it? > > (I've heard people complain about it before, but I don't remember any of > > the details.) > > Yes, somewhat, IIRC. But, I haven't really ever had to set it up. It's one > of those things which requires half of CPAN to work. So, it was annoying > when I made an attempt to package it for a distro, but if you're just > installing it following their directions, it's probably not that bad. > > But, someone is able to get away with charging $3250 a month for a > "platinum" managed install of it. (Then again, some enterprises will pay > anything for hosting...) > > Let me try a test install real quick, and I'll get back to you.
I just started looking at it, so not sure if it fits all needs but fossil has a built in bugtracker http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/index.wiki _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk