Excerpts from Reid Thompson's message of Wed Aug 04 12:16:25 -0700 2010: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:11 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 14:20 -0400, William Morgan wrote: > > > Reformatted excerpts from Ben Walton's message of 2010-07-30: > > > > I just found this (seemingly) awesome new mail handling library. I > > > > know that rmail has lots of flaws and there has been previously > > > > expressed sentiment that something better might be nice. > > > > > > If it's maintained in the least then it's probaby better than rmail, but > > > if Sup started require activesupport I would jump off a bridge. > > > > not listed in the dependencies.txt > > http://github.com/mikel/mail/blob/master/Dependencies.txt > > but it is listed in the gemspec > s.add_dependency('activesupport', ">= 2.3.6") >
Neither of those even resemble a reliable method of checking whether or not the thing actually uses activesupport. :P $ pwd /home/pi/mail $ egrep -ir require.\*active . ./lib/mail.rb: require 'active_support' ./lib/mail.rb: require 'active_support/core_ext/hash/indifferent_access' ./lib/mail.rb: require 'active_support/core_ext/object/blank' ./lib/mail.rb: require 'active_support/core_ext/string' There you have it. -- Several recent languages have adopted an Intercal-like, asynchronous, computed COME-FROM concept. Only they refer to it with funny terms like "exception handling". -- Hans Mulder _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
