Excerpts from Israel Herraiz's message of Thu Aug 19 07:58:29 -0400 2010: > Excerpts from Philipp's message of Thu Aug 19 06:52:56 -0400 2010: > > It's really annoying to send to single people instead of the list by > > accident. > > It's really annoying to send a message to the list instead of to a > single person by accident. > > In any case, mailing lists can set a Reply-To header, and I think Sup > will reply to the address included in that header. If it does not, > then I think that's a bug :-). > > Cheers, > Israel
I partially agree. I think we can take a lesson from gmail here: A simple reply always replies to the sender. A group reply will include the list of course, and in that case you are responsible for trimming the recipients. I've been caught by surprise when in 'sup a simple reply was sent to the list *instead* of the sender. It is hard to predict when it will happen, because the Reply-To header is not ordinarily visible. Erin Scott Sheldon _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
