Hi Damien, thanks for your patient reply! Excerpts from Damien Leone's message of Tue Apr 12 09:34:45 +0200 2011: > Excerpts from dtk's message of lun. avril 11 23:44:51 +0200 2011: > > why is that? I thought the way a MUA is supposed to work with a maildir is > > rather straight forward[0]? > > Well, yeah, but not sup. :) yeah, I did already recognize. not impressed :|
> > You know, I'm just wondering why this feature isn't merged in upstream. Are > > there any reasons why anyone would _not_ want proper maildir handling? Or > > is this > > just a political decision (scared, since I've seen a few of those pull down > > cool > > projects :/)? > > I think it will be merged for the next version although I didn't have > any confirmation from William yet. I don't see any reason why that > wouldn't be the case, as you said there are a lot of people interested > in this feature. > > The reason why it is not merged yet is that the code has been finished > a few weeks ago and needs some more testing (even if I've been using > it for 9 months without trouble as well as other people from this > list). actually, this soothes my concerns quite a bit. Although I still wonder a bit why this feature hasn't been built in right from the beginning, not being merged upstream due to being brand new is about the best explanation I can imagine. Well, I guess I'll just check out your branch these days and hold my breath that it makes it into the next release ;) Thanks again dtk _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
