At 10:27 -0800 11/20/2002, David R wrote:
>I was reading this interesting question on an XLR8yourmac page to UMAX from
>this guy named 'Jeff W.' about which slots to put two Twin Turbo cards in an
>s900.  In which they responded the bottom four slots.
>
>>  My Question to Umax:
>>  My question regards PCI cards and which slot to use. I have seen many
>>  discussions which recommend putting various cards in the upper two 
>>slots. I've
>>  heard explanations that range from "it won't work otherwise" to "performance
>>  is better".
>>
>>  I have two IxMicro Twin Turbo TT128M4's and two Adaptec 
>>PowerDomain 2940UW's.
>>  Obviously, all four of them cannot go in the upper two slots.   snip snip
>
>>  Thank you for your time and attention,
>>  Jeff Walther
>
>My question here is (maybe to Jeff), is there any level of Video Performance
>boost by having two TT128M8 cards installed at the same time?  I have both
>the Ultimate Rez and the original Twin Turbo so I'd also want to make sure
>there was no compatibility issue.  I'm only running one 19" monitor, but if
>the system can take advantage of the second card to boost its overall
>performance, well I have a second card that I would like to install in an
>extra slot.  Does the system utilize the memory on a second card if no
>monitor is attached?

Some background:  That was part of an email I sent to  Umax technical 
support back when there was still such a thing and I was a very fresh 
S900 owner.  Yes, their recommendation was to put the SCSI cards in 
the top slots.   (Much of that info on Mike's page is outdated by 
stuff we've figured out here.   Occasionally I think about sending 
him an update to all his notes on the S900, but time, time time.  :-) 
)

However, I eventually worked up the time and gumption to do a bunch 
of testing and what I found is that both the 2940UW and the Twin 
Turbo are very well behaved in any slot in the S900.   I also found 
that Copy Bits tests in MacBench 5 are about four times as fast with 
the Twin Turbo in the upper slots as they are in when the TT is in 
the lower slots.  Plus, the 2940UW only looses a few percent in 
performance in the lower slots.   Keep in mind that this testing was 
with the original PPC604e/200 CPU and that a fast G3 might change a 
bottleneck somewhere.

So my conclusion was that Umax had it backwards and the Twin Turbos 
belonged in the upper slots.   However, in their defense, I think 
their advice was based on general principals rather than the specific 
cards in my deck.   Back then the Ult. Rez. was still several hundred 
dollars and it was considered a great deal that OEM Apple Twin Turbo 
cards were available for $95.

No, there's no advantage to multiple TT cards unless you wish to run 
multiple monitors.  I've been using a dual monitor setup since my 
IIci days, so I wasn't about to switch fully to the S900 until I had 
two video cards in it.  As it turned out, it took me a few years 
after that as the S900 laid on it's side with the case open for all 
kinds of testing and my old Power Computing Power 120 continued in 
service as my main machine.

My experience with the Ult. Rez. in particular is that it will not 
work properly in the lower slots unless you disable one of the 
extensions.  However, if you disable that extension (forgot it's 
name, but if someone will list the three choices I can probably pick 
it out), the acceleration of the card is also disabled and it becomes 
much slower.

The specific symptoms I experienced with the Ult. Rez. was that it 
was okay in a lower slot until you try to change resolutions or color 
depth.  Upon trying to change either of those, in either the ixMicro 
CP or the Apple Monitors CP, the machine would hard freeze including 
cursor movement.  If you disable the extension that provides the 
acclereration, the problem goes away.   It sounds like a software bug 
that probably would have been pretty easy to fix if ixMicro hadn't 
evaporated too soon.  It sure would be nice if these people would 
public source their drivers when they sink.

So, if you are desperate to have an Ult. Rez. in the lower slots, you 
can do it thusly.  Anytime you want to change resolution or color 
depth, disable the guilty extension and reboot.  Then make your 
changes.  Then re-enable the extension and reboot.   This would be a 
pain, but it would make it possible to keep the Ult. Rez. in a lower 
slot and still change settings if you really needed to.   I'm not 
sure what would happen if a game tried to change the color depth for 
you.  It would probably hard freeze, is my guess.

Jeff Walther

-- 
SuperMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 Service & Replacement Parts   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

SuperMacs list info:    <http://lowendmac.com/supermacs/list.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/supermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>


---------------------------------------------------------------
>The Think Different Store
http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com
---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to