Your assertion sounds scary and foreboding in theory, but is not an issue in practice.
Certainly not an issue with the example runscript provided. Wayne http://b0llix.net/perp/ On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:11:06 -0500 (EST) Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervis...@budge.apana.org.au> wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Wayne Marshall wrote: > > > The better paradigm for dependency checking is this: for a service > > with any unmet dependency, fail immediately. > > That's great in theory, but can be very expensive in CPU and other > resources in practice. The dependency check code needs to be very > lightweight. >
