On 01/20/15 23:40, Laurent Bercot wrote: > On 20/01/2015 19:04, Olivier Brunel wrote: >> I see... Well, thing is, as you said, support for the ready file is >> already more than just s6-notifywhenup, since s6-supervise takes care of >> removing it when needed, or s6-svwait also has support for it. > > Yeah. I added the support to s6-svstat, to see whether it fits nicely, > and it does. So it's staying. > > Available in the latest git snapshot. Numbered release probably coming > soon, but I'd like to wait a bit just in case we need to break > compatibility more: I'd rather not break it several times in a row.
Cool; I see you've also added a "tainstamp" into the ready file, that's good but you forgot to update the doc of s6-notifywhenup as well, which still talks of empty file.
