I think the Right fix is to add -lskarnet to the requirments of execline.so and s6.so similar to what I've done. I was likely overzealous when I changed the .a requirements and should back that bit out.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Buck Evan <[email protected]> wrote: > Removing the s6 patch gives essentially the same issue: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol open_write used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol byte_chr used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol openreadnclose used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol uint16_pack_big used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol fd_close used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol fd_write used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol open_create used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol stralloc_catb used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol open_read used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol openwritenclose_suffix_internal used by > debian/s6/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libs6.so.2.2.0.0 found in none of the > libraries > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: 43 other similar warnings have been skipped (use > -v to see them all) > > > This is the compilation line for libs6.so: > > exec gcc -o libs6.so -std=c99 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions > -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -Wa,--noexecstack > -fno-stack-protector -pipe > -Wall -fPIC -Wl,--hash-style=both -L/usr/lib/skalibs -L/usr/lib/execline > -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -shared -Wl,-soname,libs6.so.2 > src/libs6/ftrigr1_zero.lo src > /libs6/ftrigr_check.lo src/libs6/ftrigr_end.lo src/libs6/ftrigr_start.lo > src/libs6/ftrigr_startf.lo src/libs6/ftrigr_subscribe.lo > src/libs6/ftrigr_unsubscribe.lo s > rc/libs6/ftrigr_update.lo src/libs6/ftrigr_wait_and.lo > src/libs6/ftrigr_wait_or.lo src/libs6/ftrigr_zero.lo > src/libs6/ftrigw_clean.lo src/libs6/ftrigw_fifodir_make > .lo src/libs6/ftrigw_notify.lo src/libs6/ftrigw_notifyb.lo > src/libs6/ftrigw_notifyb_nosig.lo src/libs6/s6_accessrules_backend_cdb.lo > src/libs6/s6_accessrules_backe > nd_fs.lo src/libs6/s6_accessrules_keycheck_ip4.lo > src/libs6/s6_accessrules_keycheck_ip6.lo > src/libs6/s6_accessrules_keycheck_reversedns.lo src/libs6/s6_accessrules > _keycheck_uidgid.lo src/libs6/s6_accessrules_params_free.lo > src/libs6/s6_accessrules_uidgid_cdb.lo > src/libs6/s6_accessrules_uidgid_fs.lo src/libs6/s6_supervise_loc > k.lo src/libs6/s6_supervise_lock_mode.lo src/libs6/s6_svc_write.lo > src/libs6/s6_svc_writectl.lo src/libs6/s6_svstatus_pack.lo > src/libs6/s6_svstatus_read.lo src/lib > s6/s6_svstatus_unpack.lo src/libs6/s6_svstatus_write.lo > src/libs6/s6lock_acquire.lo src/libs6/s6lock_check.lo > src/libs6/s6lock_end.lo src/libs6/s6lock_release.lo s > rc/libs6/s6lock_start.lo src/libs6/s6lock_startf.lo > src/libs6/s6lock_update.lo src/libs6/s6lock_wait_and.lo > src/libs6/s6lock_wait_or.lo src/libs6/s6lock_zero.lo sr > c/libs6/s6_fdholder_delete.lo src/libs6/s6_fdholder_delete_async.lo > src/libs6/s6_fdholder_getdump.lo src/libs6/s6_fdholder_list.lo > src/libs6/s6_fdholder_list_async > .lo src/libs6/s6_fdholder_list_cb.lo src/libs6/s6_fdholder_retrieve.lo > src/libs6/s6_fdholder_retrieve_async.lo > src/libs6/s6_fdholder_retrieve_cb.lo src/libs6/s6_fd > holder_setdump.lo src/libs6/s6_fdholder_store.lo > src/libs6/s6_fdholder_store_async.lo > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Buck Evan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is the compilation line for libexecline.so >> >> exec gcc -o libexecline.so -std=c99 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions >> -fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -Wa,--noexecstack >> -fno-stack-protector >> -pipe -Wall -fPIC -Wl,--hash-style=both -L/usr/lib/skalibs >> -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -shared -Wl,-soname,libexecline.so.2 >> src/libexecline/el_execsequence.lo sr >> c/libexecline/el_getstrict.lo src/libexecline/el_parse.lo >> src/libexecline/el_parse_from_buffer.lo >> src/libexecline/el_parse_from_string.lo src/libexecline/el_popenv >> .lo src/libexecline/el_pushenv.lo src/libexecline/el_semicolon.lo >> src/libexecline/el_spawn0.lo src/libexecline/el_spawn1.lo >> src/libexecline/el_substandrun.lo src/l >> ibexecline/el_substandrun_str.lo src/libexecline/el_substitute.lo >> src/libexecline/el_transform.lo src/libexecline/el_vardupl.lo >> src/libexecline/exlsn_define.lo src >> /libexecline/exlsn_elglob.lo src/libexecline/exlsn_import.lo >> src/libexecline/exlsn_multidefine.lo src/libexecline/exlsn_exlp.lo >> src/libexecline/exlsn_main.lo src/l >> ibexecline/exlsn_free.lo src/libexecline/exlp.lo >> >> I don't see -lskarnet. >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Buck Evan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Removing the execline patch results in: >>> >>> >>> dh_shlibdeps -O--parallel -O--autodest >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol waitpid_nointr used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol PROG used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol stralloc_catb used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol env_get2 used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol env_string used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol byte_chr used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pathexec0_run used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol str_start used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol stralloc_free used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol uint320_scan_base used by >>> debian/execline/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 found in >>> none of the libraries >>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: 18 other similar warnings have been skipped >>> (use -v to see them all) >>> >>> >>> >>> The manpage >>> <http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/jaunty/man1/dpkg-shlibdeps.1.html> >>> says: >>> >>> *symbol* *sym* *used* *by* *binary* *found* *in* *none* *of* *the* >>> *libraries.* >>> The indicated symbol has not been found in the libraries >>> linked >>> with the binary. The *binary* is most likely a library >>> and it >>> needs to be linked with an additional library during the >>> build >>> process (option *-l**library* of the linker). >>> >>> >>> >>> It's true that the execline.so doesn't link to skalibs.so even though it >>> requires its symbols: >>> >>> >>> $ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexecline.so.2.1.3.0 >>> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffff2dfe000) >>> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff5dcf8c000) >>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff5dd53f000) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Laurent Bercot <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> (Please follow-up this part of the thread to the skaware mailing-list.) >>>> >>>> On 12/08/2015 08:37, Buck Evan wrote: >>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/bukzor/s6-packaging/blob/dockerize/execline/debian/patches/02_link_against_libskarnet.patch >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/bukzor/s6-packaging/blob/dockerize/s6/debian/patches/75_dot_so_link_skarlib.patch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Again this is because the build derps without them, but I forget the >>>>> exact >>>>> failure mode. >>>>> I'll track down details upon request. >>>>> >>>> >>>> The parts for binaries and static libraries are clearly invalid. If >>>> something breaks while building those, then there's a problem with the >>>> way the build is invoked, or the options to configure. >>>> For static libraries, -lskarnet is nonsense. For binaries, -lskarnet >>>> is already listed in the requirements ($^) and should be translated >>>> to a .a or .so by vpath resolution, so it is incorrect to list it >>>> again. Something is definitely wrong if the package builds with them >>>> while it won't build without. >>>> >>>> I'm still unsure about the shared libraries parts. I don't think >>>> it should be needed, but my test suite isn't up to par and I need to >>>> update it to test the problematic cases and understand exactly what >>>> is happening. >>>> >>>> In the meantime, please find the problem with your build and fix it. >>>> Chances are you won't need the shared libraries patch either once >>>> you've done that. :) >>>> >>>> >>>> It seems likely to me that you'll want to figure out and fix these two >>>>> issues given your response to the above patch. >>>>> Is that right? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, and now you have work to do too. :P >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Laurent >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
