On Sep 7, 2015 2:53 PM, "Buck Evan" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Colin: > > Can we have a look at the script you're referring to? > > Are you making a point in favor of explicit ./check support in s6, or against, or something else? I can't quite tell. > > --phone is hard. > Sorry! Explicit ./check-like behavior baked in to the ./run of the service that needs checking as a way of translating from ./check polling into s6 notification. Basically Laurent's example though in my specific case the functionality test is directly in the run script instead of in a support script since the test is super simple.
In more general terms, I don't think s6 needs an `sv check' style test added to it. Running those tests in a run script and translating the results into notifications is a lot more powerful, and it simplifies the between-service api. I'll post the script when I'm near my computer, phone here too. Cheers!
