Many thanks for the clarification. Now I (kind of) understand the difference :)
[Resending again due to forgotten list-reply; will use the following command to reduce the probability of this happening again: $ printf 'bind index r list-reply\nbind index L reply\n' >> ~/.muttrc] On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 01:36:08PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote: > Not quite: if a bundle was a no-op oneshot, you could still have all > its dependencies up while the bundle itself would be down. It wouldn't be > a strict equivalence, but a container of sorts - a bit like "metapackages" > for some distributions, that you can remove once they have installed all > their contents. > > That's not what I was going after with bundles. A bundle is really an > alias for a set of services, instead of one service that may or may not > pull in others via the dependency mechanism. -- My current OpenPGP key: RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19) 7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C
