On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, now let's have a look at LISTEN_FDS.
I also find these particular implementation details a poor choice. I was going to recommend a different environment convention, but then I saw the pre-existing convention was copied exactly. If I was Daniel, I'd create something better. But I'm not sure there's enough interest/need to warrant it. (Daemons currently written to expect LISTEN_FDS could have a chain-loaded conversion program.) Not that I'm particularly knowledgeable here; s6's fdholding seems able to fill this niche already.
