When lnav implemented the support - they did exactly what sounds reasonable - they took the tool they wished to support (multilog I would presume as it mentionds cr.yp.to) and implemented the code required to produce a view of that tool's logs. To say that is a lack of understanding is rather harsh here.
Right. I was being charitable; it's indeed also possible that they *intentionally* did the wrong thing, which is obviously much worse. :P -- Laurent
