2009/9/9 Chris McDonough <[email protected]>: > More descriptively, it transitions from STARTING to RUNNING if the process is > still "up" after startsecs have gone by.
Aha. Well, in that case, depends+startsecs and startdelay would be pretty much the same thing, actually. Although startdelay would be easier to implement. 2009/9/10 Roger Hoover <[email protected]>: > The existing priority parameter would accomplish the same thing as a new > depends parameter, yes? You mean that it could be changed to wait for lower priority processes to get into the running state before starting the higher ones? That could work too, but doesn't that change the behavior from now? -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
