On 22/10/2010 19:20, Jordi Funollet wrote: > On Friday 22 October 2010 16:18:03 you wrote: >> Monit is great as a back-up, but it's a little more "coarse" than >> supervisor. We would need to write init scripts for each program, >> whereas supervisor handles that much better than we can. We simply want >> to monitor cpu load for certain processes so that they restart if they >> misbehave. Currently supervisor can't do this. > Uh, right. I was in this situation some time ago and that's how I finally > found God (http://god.rubyforge.org/). > > It's kind of supervisord + monit, but looked too cumbersome for what I needed.
We looked at God also, but came to the same conclusion. Monit is "good enough", as is supervisor. Using them together is working well so far - monit keeps an eye on supervisor, supervisor keeps many custom servers/apps/daemons running. -- *Phillip B Oldham* ActivityHQ ph...@activityhq.com <mailto:ph...@theactivitypeople.co.uk> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Policies* This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. No action should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. This e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium, and we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus. We must advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are completely virus free, and that you understand and observe the lack of security when e-mailing us. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list Supervisor-users@lists.supervisord.org http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
