On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:42 +0100, Grzegorz Nosek wrote: > Hi, > > (this mail only reached me moments ago, along with several others even > older from supervisor-users@, strange)
It's because Mike sent it to the list without being subscribed and I pulled it out of the rejection queue. - C > > W dniu 02.12.2010 22:07, Mike Lewis pisze: > > Hi, > > > > I have been considering using supervisord for our local dev > > environments here instead of a custom rolled solution that we've had > > in place. The thing that is holding me back right now is that we have > > custom ports for all the processes we launch because we make it so we > > can have multiple instances of the environments being run. > > This kind of matches our production environment (a few "template" > configs, running on all kinds of sockets and ports under different users.) > > > It seems like there's no way to easily have "dynamic" configuration > > files right now, however I feel it would not be too hard to add > > support. > > > > One proposal I have is to allow reference to environment variables by > > letting expansions like %($ENV_VAR)s be valid. > > So, umm, how do you configure the environment variables then? Via > environment=... setting? You can't inherit it from supervisord's > environment as that would make all the processes share the values, > defeating the point I guess. How is that easier than configuring > supervisord directly? Or am I missing something? > > > It's a fairly trivial change to make (hacked together patch attached). > > > > The other thing that may be cool is allowing for preprocessing of > > config files with a templating langauge. > > While I'm using a template for my configs (jinja2 to be precise), I > think I'm against adding such a feature to supervisord core (not that I > have any say in this). I'd guess the requirements for more sophisticated > config handling vary from site to site so one size wouldn't fit all. > Besides, I'm quite happy with automatically (re)generating a config file > and issuing a supervisorctl update every now and then. One other lesson > I learned was to keep the process manager as simple as possible with > limited responsibilities and reasons for updates -- that's one daemon > you don't want to restart frequently. > > > As an aside, I kinda wish supervisor was on github. Would make it > > much easier to contribute. > > It is now. Whee, about to rebase my repo :) > > Best regards, > Grzegorz Nosek > _______________________________________________ > Supervisor-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users > _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
