Can anyone confirm that this is actually working in the latest version of Supervisor?
Supervisor 3.0a10 definitely *does not* print log output after a process has been sent the "stop" command. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Neil Hooey <[email protected]> wrote: > I finally upgraded to Supervisor 3.0a10, and it's still not printing logs > after a "stop" command is issued. > > The stopsignal for my Supervisor program is "INT". > > Has this been actually fixed in a more recent version of Supervisor? > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Mike Naberezny <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Neil, >> >> >> On 5/17/12 11:21 AM, Neil Hooey wrote: >> >>> There are no log lines printed after the process is stopped. >>> >>> Is there any way to get Supervisor to continue capturing logs after the >>> signal >>> has been sent? >>> >> >> In Supervisor 3.0a10, a bug was fixed that caused some log output to be >> missed. Please upgrade if you are running an earlier version. >> >> Regards, >> Mike >> >> -- >> Mike Naberezny >> Maintainable Software >> http://maintainable.com >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Supervisor-users mailing list >> Supervisor-users@lists.**supervisord.org<[email protected]> >> http://lists.supervisord.org/**mailman/listinfo/supervisor-**users<http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
