On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:13:45AM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen (pfse...@tapanitarvai
> I took a stab at hacking filter.inc and modified it so that if > there's <source-address> modifier in the nat rule, it uses it > as source in the rdr entry. Does anybody think it'd be worthwhile to submit that as a patch? Or would someone like to see it otherwise (small enough even for posting on the list, perhaps - 105 line context diff)? It's not very useful in itself, but not dangerous either, as it should have no effect whatsoever unless one manually adds <source-address> entries to config file. But it would allow using SNAT for those who need it badly enough to edit xml files manually, and it might be useful as a first step towards proper SNAT support later (with GUI and all). -- Tapani Tarvainen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
