FYI, in pfSense 2.0 we stopped doing that and became a bit smarter about it.
But hey, it was a version 1 product. Regards, Seth Op 18 sep 2010, om 17:21 heeft Nathan Eisenberg het volgende geschreven: > The interface rebuilds was an absolute killer for me. I've had to move our > shared firewall option on our dedicated servers to a different product, > because everytime I added a new customer and vlan, it dropped everyone on > that firewall for 10 seconds. Totally untenable. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Aarno Aukia [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 7:28 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] BGP >> >> Hello Ermal, >> >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 14:38, Ermal Luçi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We had full tables on pfsense for almost 2 years, but have now moved >>>> on to custom openbsd routers for that. Since you only want to use the >>> Any reason you switched to OpenBSD? >> >> Not specifically, I just disliked the way pfsense 1.2.3 handled interface >> (e.g. vlan >> interface) adds, where it removes all interfaces and rebuilds them again, >> dropping all neighbour sessions. That, and some quirks in the gui with full >> tables (static route add/delete wont work and status->interfaces hangs) and >> we >> got someone with openbsd know-how led to the decision for the routers. We're >> still running lots of pfsense firewalls though and are happy with them. >> >> Regards, >> Aarno >> -- >> Aarno Aukia >> Atrila GmbH >> Switzerland >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
