----- "Chris Buechler" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gordon Russell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The base version of untangle is free
> 
> Aside from the hardware, with its considerable bloat, the hardware
> available may not be able to accommodate that scenario. Though if the
> hardware can run ESXi, putting it on a VM to do only spam (assuming
> that's possible, I'm not entirely sure), and only directing mail
> through it without putting it inline, should make that a non-factor.
> Then even if it is extremely slow it won't really matter.
> 

 I was just suggesting to the OP that there is free software out there to 
achieve his goals -- which is more of a UTM than pure firewall scenario. In the 
OP's words he needs to:
 
 "run pfSense, SpamAssassin, ClamAV, Squid and Squidgaurd to filter all traffic 
in and out bound"

Why cobble together a VM scenario to do that, when there is packaged, simple, 
free software achieve his ends? I don't know that a VM'ed scenario would be any 
less resource intensive than untangle. It would certainly be a more challenging 
"learning experience" for one to set up though.
PFsense is a great firewall platform, and Chris you do a great job with it.. 
I'm not knocking it in any way, just suggesting to the OP that another platform 
may be better suited to his needs (and experience level).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org

Reply via email to